Note: I wrote this for a media consumption journal for a media literacy class but wanted to blog about it as well so if it sounds a bit formal, that is why.
This
past week I’ve noticed something in multiple forms of media I watch that has
started to bother me. It’s not necessarily in the media itself, but rather the
publicity of the media. The issue I’m struggling with deals with same-sex
couples in the media. There have been instances in the media lately that show
same-sex couples in an incredibly positive light and show how normal it is for
the parents of the family to be gay. However, what I’ve started noticing,
analyzing, and become frustrated about is the fact that the media has to take
that inclusion of gay people and talk about it nonstop.
In
the Disney channel show Good Luck Charlie
the young daughter, Charlie, of the main family is going to have a play-date.
When her friend Taylor’s parents arrive to drop her off for the play-date,
Charlie’s parents discover Taylor’s parents are two women. Charlie’s parents
don’t act too shocked and the producers make this inclusion seamless. However,
after that episode aired, I logged into Facebook and saw post after post of the
clip from the show. I think it’s great what Disney did with this and the way
they handled it was very professional. The media, though, took the clip and
talked about it’s significance over and over again.
This type of
publicity creates a barrier between what is “normal” (a heterosexual couple as
the parents of the family) and what is “strange” or “different” (a homosexual
couple as parents). [As a side note, I think we can all agree that two
Caucasian, heterosexual people is no longer the “norm” in America for parents
anyway. But for this example we’ll call that the “norm”.] As soon as something
in television is done controversially different, people in the media feel the
need to talk about it again and again to point out the fact that something was
done differently. This might be acceptable with certain issues, but because
this is a very important political issue in our country right now, it can
dramatically change the perspective people have on the issue.
If the media and
people in our society just left the issue alone and acted as if nothing strange
had happened, that same-sex couples were just expected as part of a show about
families, there wouldn’t be such a divide between what is considered “normal”
and what is “strange.” If we can break down that divide, nothing would be
considered “stranger than” on a scale in comparison to something similar, yet
more “normal.” We would instead have a society that valued the differences
among people and families, rather than shaming them for their lifestyle and
biology.
We’ve arrived at a
point in media that requires we touch on multiple issues in every show in order
to remain “politically correct.” While this is polite and may seem like the
right thing to do, viewers can see right through what producers are attempting
to do. For example, I enjoy watching the show The Fosters for the creative plot line and interesting characters.
However, I get frustrated sometimes when the characters or story seems to be
placed in the show just “because they had to” put them there. Shows are most
entertaining when they break the PC rules; maybe not for everyone, but I guess
to me I’m more entertained with parodies of real life versus a boring show
trying hard to include all different types of people and make it seem as normal
as possible. Certain personality traits should be included where it’s necessary
but not every possible trait needs to be included in one episode of a
television show.
No comments:
Post a Comment